Hobbes vs Hume Essay examples - 988 Words

Prathyusha Guduru In the history of philosophy, two of the most prominent philosophers were Hobbes and Hume. Both made important contributions to the world of ethics. One of the main important things they differed on is reason. Hobbs felt that reason is way to seek peace but Hume felt the reason is only a slave to passions. In the following paragraphs, you will see how Hobbes and Hume explain their different views on reason the theories of the two philosophers are analyzed in depth, so that we can have a comprehensive understanding. Thomas Hobbes, an English philosopher published his masterwork, the Leviathan, in 1651. This book influenced western philosophy with its view on the Social Contract theory. A social contract†¦show more content†¦Hobbes believes that by being rational beings, and reasoning out things, we can all live a little more peacefully. David Hume was a Scottish philosopher known for being an empiricist and for being skeptical of religion. Like Hobbes, he was also a big influence on western philosophy. Among his many works, his major writing include, treatise of human nature and enquiry concerning the principles of morals. In an enquiry concerning the principles of morals, Hume introduces his fovarism towards the role of sentiment. He argued reason solely cannot be a motive of any action and that reason can never resist the motive of passion reason is, and ought only to be the slave of the passions,(pg 415). He explains that Moral distinctions are developed from the moral sentime nts such as feelings of approval and disapproval felt by an action. Hume believes that pleasure and pain are the causes of the passions that drive our actions. According to Hume, it is the pleasure and pain that are the causes of the passions which drives our actions. He claims that it is the actual experience of the pain or pleasure, not the reason we adduce to their causes that drives us to act.† Morals excite passions, and produce or prevent actions. Reason of itself is utterly impotent in this particular. The rules of morality, therefore, are notShow MoreRelatedComparing Compatibilism Vs Incompatibilism : A Compatibilist View1332 Words   |  6 PagesCompatibilism vs Incompatibilism: a compatibilist view Does determinism imply that there is no free will, as the incompatibilists argue, or does it allow for free will, as the compatibilists argue? Determinism is the doctrine, that every event, as well as human actions is determined by causes that are independent to the will. From determinism, two opposing views were identified. The incompatibilists view that determinism implies no free will, or the compatibilists view that determinism still allowsRead MorePhi2010 Philosophy Research Project. Madison Lee. Free1754 Words   |  8 PagesPHI2010 Philosophy Research Project Madison Lee Free Will, Kevin Timpe As humans, free will is something we commonly assume we have. When evaluating what free will is, we become less certain. David Hume calls it â€Å"the most contentious question of metaphysics.† In simplistic terms, free will is having the ability to determine your own plan of action. There is a relationship between free will and freedom of action and causal determinism that must be evaluated to have a complete understanding of freeRead MoreThe Republicn and a Brief History of Philosphy1763 Words   |  7 PagesSecondary to that there is truth, this idea is one that the main character struggles with the most throughout the film. As the film opens we are introduced to each character and their current spouse. All seems to be well other than the normal husband vs. in law rivalry, some may say that portrayal of life seems reasonable. What we find out as the film progresses is that the problems within these couples goes deeper than the traditional family feud. The main character Judah is having an affair withRead MorePolitics Is Considered By Most Reliable And Accurate Results1902 Words   |  8 Pageshow it should be studied, from the complexity of theories, to the method of theory formulation, even to the basic ontology of the ‘political’. In this regard, politics can be considered a ‘hard’ science, as so little of it is concrete. Simplicity vs Complexity In the methodology of political theory, an important distinction between completing models is the varying complexity or simplicity in the assumptions that make them up. Simplicity, or parsimonious model â€Å"is one which includes as few variablesRead MoreThe Theory Of Psychology And Psychology3461 Words   |  14 Pagesthat could be collected and opened psychology up to new methodologies in general. Before Darwin, it is believed that our understanding of the psychology was shaped by philosophical speculation. Even great philosophers like Plato, Aristotle, Hobbes and Hume were unable to explain the causes behind mental behaviours in humans though they were able to describe them. Darwin’s theory of evolution yet again provided the basic ground elements to the understanding that it was evolution, which has influencedRead MoreCognitive psychology  . Essay5542 Words   |  23 Pagesin philosophy. What Berkeley set out to achieve was the removing of validity from materialism and to do this by refuting the latent or explicitly materialistic content both in Lockes Essay and in Descartes and Hobbes geometric theories of man and society. David Hume (1711-1776) Hume published a Treatise of Human Nature. He emphasized Lockes notion of the compounding of simple ideas into complex ideas, developing and making more explicit the notion of association. He abolished mind as a substanceRead MoreEssay on Our Posthuman Future: The Philosophical Implications2960 Words   |  12 Pagesresearchers who are engaged in studying the nature of human thinking and problem solving. The first definition of what it means to think is that of the Enlightenment Philosopher, Thomas Hobbes who posited, â€Å"Thinking was nothing more than reckoning† (Mays, 1952, 159). Next, the other philosophers like Kant, Leibniz, and Hume postulated that thinking is an extension of one’s mind, which is echoed by Descartes (widely regarded as the pioneer of cognition) who stated, â€Å"I Think, Therefore I am† (Mays, 1952Read MoreCleanth Brookss Essay Irony as a Principle of Structure9125 Words   |  37 Pageswork is often split up into sections as follows (a lthough other splits have also been suggested):Lines 1 - 37: On unity and harmony. Lines 38 - 72: The writer’s aims. Lines 73 - 118: What the tradition dictates (decorum). Lines 119 - 152: Invention vs. imitation (be consistent if you are original). Lines 153 - 188: On characterization (the four ages of man). Lines 189 - 219: On the gods, chorus and music (in tragic drama). Lines 220 - 250: On style (especially in satyr plays). Lines 251 - 274: OnRead MoreSources of Ethics20199 Words   |  81 Pagesbehaviours inbred, written indelibly in our genes as immutable biological imperatives, or is the environment more important in shaping our thoughts and actions? Such questions cycle through society repeatedly, forming the public nexus of the nature vs. nurture controversy, a strange locution to biologists, who recognize that behaviours exist only in the context of environmental influence. Nonetheless, the debate flares anew every few years, reigniting in response to genetic analyses of traits suchRead MoreStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 Pages6 (2005), pp. 1185–1203; and S. E. Scullen, M. K. Mount, and T. A. Judge, â€Å"Evidence of the Construct Validity of Developmental Ratings of Managerial Performance,† Journal of Applied Psychology 88, no. 1 (2003), pp. 50–66. 9. F. Luthans, â€Å"Succe ssful vs. Effective Real Managers,† Academy of Management Executive (May 1988), pp. 127–132; and F. Luthans, R. M. Hodgetts, and S. A. Rosenkrantz, Real Managers (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1988). See also F. Shipper and J. Davy, â€Å"A Model and Investigation of